Two articles analysis

The two articles i have chose are from BBC sport and the guardian and they are about the Rugby world cup game played by England and Wales.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/34376488
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/sep/28/england-wales-rugby-world-cup-2015

After reading both articles it has came to my view that they have both differences and similarities.

The guardians article went into more detail on the devastating loss for England with a step by step analysis of the game. On the other hand BBC's article was much more summarized and even though it gave all the core information (which is the most important thing) the guardian went into a lot more depth.

The language from the guardian is much more complexed and the layout is in paragraphs with a lot of text. The BBC article is different to this because it is set out in small paragraphs (usually 3 lines) with information focused on highlights of the match, quotes or facts about the game or what is likely to happen in the future. The article is also field with pictures and diagrams of players or match statistics, which are shown by charts and World cup related features like the group tables.

The BBC also focus on key players and features of the game, where as the guardian cover almost everything happening.

At the end of the article the guardian summarizes the previous information, where as because BBC is full of summarizing they just end the article pretty briefly.

In my opinion if you are looking for a long detailed description on the game i would look on the guardian for an article or even if you have missed the game you could read this and gain a lot of information. Where as if you have seen the game BBC sport is good as a reminder or to see quick summarized analysis or statistics.